Vet practice in 43 The Mall

The Young Veterinary Partnership – The Mall

4.3(234 reviews)
43 The Mall, London, W5 3TJ
Open Weekends

About this practice

The Young Veterinary Partnership – The Mall in 43 The Mall

The Young Veterinary Partnership, situated at 43 The Mall in London W5 3TJ, is a comprehensive veterinary clinic catering to a wide array of pets. Local residents can bring their beloved cats and dogs here, while the clinic also extends its expertise to small mammals and even offers services for exotic animals and wildlife, reflecting a broad commitment to animal welfare. This practice distinguishes itself through its dedication to offering veterinary care seven days a week, providing extended weekday hours and convenient weekend appointments. Such accessibility ensures that pet owners have flexible options for consultations and emergencies, making it a reliable pillar of the local pet community. For those planning a visit, the clinic operates from 08:30 to 19:00 on weekdays, 09:00 to 13:00 on Saturdays, and 10:00 to 12:00 on Sundays. Contact is readily available via phone at 020856727240711 or email at ealing@youngvets.co.uk. Information regarding parking and accessibility details can be obtained directly through these contact channels.

The Young Veterinary Partnership – The Mall is based at 43 The Mall, London, W5 3TJ in London. The practice treats cats, dogs, exotic/wild and small mammals. It is open at weekends.

Animals treated

Dogs
Cats
Small Mammals
Exotic/Wild

The Young Veterinary Partnership – The Mall Prices

No published pricing found

We couldn't find any pricing on The Young Veterinary Partnership – The Mall's website, and they haven't yet claimed their listing to display their own prices.

Are you responsible for this practice?

Claim this listing for free to add your own consultation, vaccination, neutering and health plan prices — and help local pet owners make informed choices.

Claim this listing

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about The Young Veterinary Partnership – The Mall.

The Young Veterinary Partnership – The Mall reviews

4.3(234 reviews)

Average rating of 4.3 out of 5 based on 234 reviews. Sourced from Google.

Latest reviews

Read the five most recent/ recommended reviews for The Young Veterinary Partnership – The Mall. Order provided by Google.

  • Jacqui Bailie· 2 months ago

    My cat had to have 2 teeth extracted. The staff were kind and caring, explained the treatment fully, and all aftercare, antibiotics and painkillers were included, so pricing was transparent. They also helped with my insurance claim. Parking can be tricky otherwise would be 5 stars.

    Read on Google →
  • West London Guy· 10 months ago

    My beloved cat was ill. We took him to Young Veterinary Partnership. He subsequently died. I was devastated. We'd arranged for him to be cremated individually. I couldn't face the idea of him being cremated with other pets. It cost £250 but I didn't care. I had to go and collect his remains. I could barely speak, I was so upset. The staff were incredibly sensitive. They knew why I was there and with me barely speaking, they gave me his remains and took the payment. They knew who I was and found it on their system with me practically saying nothing. My cats have always been my children. They understood my loss and did everything they could to mitigate that loss. They also didn't make me feel guilty for crying.

    Read on Google →
  • Joan Airey· a year ago

    It is with regret that I write this review about an independent veterinary practice at a time when the industry is under scrutiny. I registered my cat with Youngs when he was a kitten and in October sought a medical explanation for his tendency to overgroom. I received an e-mail from Dr Wilson, proprietor of Youngs as follows: '...would require a full dermatological investigation to determine the underlying cause - full blood profile, skin scrapes, fungal culture and skin biopsies under sedation, initially possibly with allergy blood testing on initial results before specific medication can be prescribed. This would require coming in for a morning appointment and then leaving Sasha with us for the day....approx. £1,000 for initial tests (not including allergy tests)'. I was shocked to receive such an abrupt message. There was no narrative, breakdown of this figure and what the 'allergy tests' might cost. I requested further information from him but got a reply from Office Manager, Vicky. I was then requested to book a consultation (presumably the morning appointment) just prior to the procedure. Although not stated, I got the impression this would incur a further fee. I was then obliged to do my own research to find that one of the procedures involved chunks being taken out of my cat, hence the sedation. I then felt the need to seek advice from another practice, more forthcoming, with a friendlier disposition, and to whom I ultimately 'defected' for Sasha's care. I was absolutely flabbergasted by Youngs' overt attempt to financially gain by withholding this essential information. To me, this was unadulterated greed. I was not asking them to divulge trade secrets but let me know the cost of each component as well as any supplementary expenses. For instance, I also found my cat would have to wear a collar for a few days until sutures had healed. Discussed only on the day, this would have influenced me as to whether to go ahead. Indeed, if I had declined, our trip would have been pointless, money wasted and Youngs would not have got the gig, which they failed to do anyway. It therefore made sense for them to be up front about the overall cost and what was involved. Vicky responded to my concern about the withholding of information saying that: 'Dr Wilson may have assumed he had addressed your concerns fully, with the understanding that any remaining questions could be discussed in more detail during your pre-op appointment'. However, I could not find any indication of where he made such an assumption. There was no mention of any fee for this 'pre-op appointment' or if it was part of the open ended £1000. To complicate the issue, Vicky said: 'Regarding surgical procedures, I would like to assure you that we INCLUDE (my emphasis) a pre-operative health check the morning of the surgery.....and we offer this as an opportunity to answer any questions that owners might have. We believe that this face to face interaction helps to resolve any outstanding concerns better than e-mail exchanges'. I sent a letter to Dr Wilson, snail mail but only got a reply from Vicky, assuring me that he was 'aware of' my concerns. I remain satisfied that he did not even read my letter. Furthermore, her reply was actually unsigned with no last name. Never before have I been on the receiving end of such sheer impertinence, which suggested utter contempt for both me and my pet. The bottom line is that I was a loyal customer for the best part of three years. I still find this jaw-droppingly unbelievable. It remained unclear how much this procedure would have been in total and when I would have found out. Remember, the £1000 was only for 'initial tests'. What is worse is that this arrogance and high handedness in the pursuit of profit was from those who purport to be part of the caring industry for both animals and their human companions. I would advise anyone in a similar position to ask all the questions you want before parting with any money and if not satisfied, do what I did, go elsewhere and leave a review like mine.

    Read on Google →
  • Sarah Winter· a year ago

    Been a client for many years, my small animals get the best care from them from the start until they pass. I lost my little Persian rescue recently and they gave her amazing palliative care, and allowed me to give her the best send off with her loved ones and her dogs around her. Nothing is ever too much trouble from the reception staff, to the vet nurses, to the vets, they work together and make your pets feel special.

    Read on Google →
  • zina sackur· 3 years ago

    I had to put my beloved cat Bella down on Sunday morning, the staff at Young Veterinary clinic could not have been kinder or more supportive. The vet in charge was exceptionally gentle and empathetic.

    Read on Google →

Prices and data are collected directly from the RCVS, veterinary practice websites, published price lists and other verified sources. We regularly review listings to help keep information accurate. All ratings and reviews are provided by Google. If you see any data discrepancy, you can report it here.